Implementing Bring your own – don’t forget your race day tactics…

Bring Your Own (BYO) device is one of the hot topics of 2012. I have friends and family (who mostly don’t work in IT), asking me about this BYO idea that they have heard about via the coverage it has had on mainstream news sites (good and bad). Then they tell me how they can get their email or access to work files or applications from their own device.

Atos – Implementing Bring your own – don’t forget your race day tacticsI try to avoid talking about work when outside of work, but this is a topic that is shaping up so many workplaces across the world, that I can’t help but ask questions. What do you use? Typically the answer is an iPad or iPhone, but some also tell me how they can get their work desktop on their home pc via some form of magic (that those in the IT industry call a hosted virtual desktop). When I ask if they are allowed to do it, the answer is almost universally a vague “ummm, don’t know… but it works…”

Now BYO is not new, with forward thinking organisations having done it in some form or another for the last few years, but the wide availability of mobile devices today means it’s now more talked about than ever and typically without full clarity about what is and isn’t allowed. So what does an IT organisation need to do it to enable a scheme and prevent the viral spread of unknown devices connecting into the corporate network? The answer in its simplest form is an obvious one, it is all about creating and implementing a clear plan, that covers the scope of BYO end to end.

Part of the plan should be the technology solutions such as mobile device management or enabling access to business applications and data securely. These technologies give back some control to IT without impacting, encroaching on personal privacy or over complicating the daily user experience. Too complicated a plan and it will be difficult to implement and show benefits from the effort and investment made. Too simple and you might not deliver all of the security features required to secure the business.

In an Olympic marathon, the winner isn’t just the best athlete physically, but the one who has the best strategy and tactics to cope with the scenarios that arise on race day. Think of the level of technology deployed as the athlete’s fitness, essential to be competitive, but on its own not enough to succeed. It is the other elements that make up a winning athlete, the preparation; the mental preparation, the game plan and it is these that make the winner cross the line first. Critical to success of BYO is the non IT aspects. The focus on aspects of BYO like HR, taxation and security policies to make a scheme successful, definitely don’t leave these until you are on the start line. Make it clear to the users what the rules are, what is and isn’t permitted. Ensure they know the plan and agree to play by the rules.

IT department must work with users to understand all eventualities and be ready to react quickly when something unexpected happens. This is the difference between a good scheme and a winning scheme. Often a clear policy can enforce a change in behaviour as well as a technology, removing the vagueness from users.  Be prepared to change the plan as you learn and find out more about the needs of different areas of the business. The beauty of Olympic sport is that no two athletes are the same and no two race outcomes are ever identical. This beauty in sport is the challenge of a BYO scheme, which is as personal as corporate IT becomes; no department or employee are ever the same.

‘Bring your own device’ is made by  Trendmatcher

James McMahon

James McMahon is Domain Manager for the Adaptive Workplace offering within the global portfolio management team and also a member of Atos scientific community. His role is focused on the development of the future desktop and workplace products for Atos clients, providing services and solutions that enabling new and future work styles and innovative solutions that embrace cloud, consummerisation, social networking and collaboration. He strongly believes in a people centric approach to IT and has a real passion for the human side of the workplace, how technology can bring people together, enhancing the lives of us all. He has been in the IT industry for 11 years and has been involved in the delivery of a number of large and complex IT transformation programmes across different industries.

3 comments

  1. Renee Bahman says:

    BYO could be a good Solution if InfoSec can be assured.
    For a cost avoiding, there can be some insentives to support the initiative.
    I do not think the cost is a major driver here, it is rather user preference. For a sales function iPad would be good, for ap rogrammer or engineer – someting else.
    Everyday applications are more and more cloud based, so entering them with own preferred device would be nice. Especially as many of the applications are provided as service (e-mail, CRM, BI, etc.)

  2. James McMahon says:

    Consumerization is a worldwide phenomenon, not something born out of one country. The desire of users to choose and use their own devices is something real worldwide. I also argue that BYO highlights security issues that have been dormant in many enterprises for too long, hidden away behind monolithic perimeter security measures, rather than introducing new threats. If you don’t believe in the demand, just look at the number of devices people already connect with, whether it permissible or not.

    You are right on 2 points. Firstly users should be able to connect what device they want, but within in the bounds of a tiered access policy which, depending on how comfortable IT are on the chosen device platform, dictate what corporate service can be accessed. These will differ for different form factors also (think snack, dine, cook = smartphone, tablet, PC). Secondly, the drivers to do BYOD absolutely should not be cost. When you look at TCO, the actual purchase price of a device is a small element of the TCO over the life of a device…

  3. Drew McMutrie says:

    Sorry but BYO(D) seems like yet another American-originated idea to reduce corporate costs by not providing the kit required for employees to function. It will lead to danger and horrendous problems for company security and some slow response to connection requests – what happens when someone wants to use an UNKNOWNTECH XX tablet which has never been heard of before running some new Linux O/S? Small devices such as smart phones and tablets may be ok for reading emails but not much else – and that will disappear when the next big thing of zero email arrives…
    This is realism not cynicism.In the wider and more grounded IT world there is still much debate abot this subject.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>