Rob Price

Rob leads the IT Leadership Practice in Atos Consulting, combining the experience and confidence of a focused delivery consultancy team with a passion for innovation and collaboration and all things new. He applies this, both personally and as a team, to drive forward a CIO Advisory consultancy practice that delivers strategic technology advisory with a pragmatic can-do delivery mentality. He successfully melds inspiration and creativity with strategic direction and implementation, focusing on driving more efficient and effective exploitation of technology and services to drive benefits to the client and their customers. He has an extensive background in the delivery of major projects and programmes into predominantly the Transport, Construction and Government markets, including most recently the 2012 Olympic Games. His competitiveness and passion for all sport, combined with a love of the challenge, drives his desire to win. Winning can be realised through trophies, awards, contracts, achievements .. But more importantly in this case, by creating a leading CIO/CTO blog that adds real value to the space in which we operate. Welcome to the promise.

What is the role of the “commercial network”?

Comments Off

Did you watch the BBC programme this Sunday on Facebook? The quote I want to take from it was from Sir Martin Sorrell, CEO of WPP Group. Whilst commenting on the likely success of advertising in Facebook, he stated that it was a social (some would say THE social) network, not a commercial network. Interesting.

 

I keep Facebook largely separate from work. For work – my commercial network – I have LinkedIn. The thing is, brilliant that LinkedIn is, it still operates primarily at the individual level. However, last Thursday night, I was fortunate to be present at the (second) launch of something that could perhaps just realise that true “commercial network” vision.

 

www.techcitymap.com is a visual feast, currently combining vast amounts of manual research of which companies exist within the much heralded Tech City/ Silicon Roundabout area of East London, together with the real time relationships as described by twitter. It’s just the start. There are plans to put further layers of data into the network analysis, for example from LinkedIn (a Founding Partner in the map) and to introduce searches and collaboration and greater depth of functionality.

 

It’s fantastic. But so what? What does it become? What difference can it make? Charles Armstrong, CEO of Trampoline, once told me that on average, each company only really knew 5 to 6 others within the map. It’s not the case now. Any of us can go in and look at who does what? Who tweets what? Who influences who? And where do they conduct their business.

 

For example, it didn’t take us long to find four mobile tech companies on the map, to ring three and to meet two. All within a couple of days. It’s obvious the benefit that it can have. We can only ever know those we know when partnering in business. And now we can know so many more. Or invest in more. Or acquire more. Or destroy more.

 

My point is deliberately controversial. The social network has existed to extend the breadth of relationship, but arguably to diminish the strength of the core relationships. What is the role of the “commercial network”? And how is it perceived from each member. The agile, dynamic start-up is a very different beast from the global behemoth.

 

We must argue that it can argue as a catalyst to growth, as a way of realising value for those early investors, for those prepared to take the risk. And yet, how sustainable is the “commercial network? In truth, I’m not sure. www.techcitymap.com is just brilliant. Check it out and see for yourself. It is perhaps a geographically bounded social experiment. Is it a tool for measuring change, or is it a tool that drives that change?

 

I am proud to be involved, if only in a very small way. Proud to be an evangelist for something that – for those of us that are watching the evolution of the way in which we conduct business in a more connected, more mobile, more social, more chaotic style – has the potential to influence that change to a degree that we can possibly not yet foresee.

Continuity in the Cloud

Comments Off

There is a debate that has raged for at least 2 years.Continuity in the Cloud

On one side are those who claim that the Cloud is merely an evolution of where we have been. On the other side are those, like myself, who claim that the Cloud is fundamental revolution.

Those who claim that the Cloud is merely an evolution are doing the best that they can to ensure that the world that they know – that of big software, control, consolidation and structure – remains in place at all cost.

Those that drive revolution … persevere.

This belief arises from a number of incontrovertible facts.

* Everything is connected
* Everyone is mobile
* Creating social everything and everyone
* Four generations are active in the workplace, including the  Digital Native – those who only know everything connected
* Electracy (ref. Gregory Ulmer) is their new Literacy
* Information is everything.

We are moving from a world of control and cannot, to a world of accept and allow. Abandoning frustration in the hope of enablement.

I have conversations about virtualisation, about infrastructure/software/platform/ everything as a service, and yet for me it seems obvious. Everything will exist in the workplace. There will be an inevitable mix. Private/Public cloud, SaaS services consumed by the business, by IT, by the individual, hardware device choices made by the corporate, by the business unit, by the individual. Don’t deny it. It happens today. I bet that between 25-50% of your workforce today are using things that they “shouldn’t” and yet they do. And will continue to do so.

I’ve begun to ask myself a question.

“How quickly can I “trade” a service?”

It was 3-5 years of course. In some cases today, maybe it’s only a month. I can foresee in the future that certain commoditised services around computing power… maybe it’s only a day … is an hour too ridiculous? If that’s the case, what do I need to think about to ensure business continuity. To deliver certainty from my new stance of Accept and Allow.

Here are some thoughts.

1. Plan to get OUT before you get in.

A client recently expressed a concern about tie in with a service they had been offered that was hosted in that suppliers “Private Cloud”. Never feel that. You should always have an exit plan – an understanding of continuity of service should you move elsewhere. How do you get your information out? In this new world in which we habit, your data, your information, your business IP is your differentiation

2. Find those who exhibit the new behaviours.

There is seen to be a resource shortage in the industry, more specifically a resource shortage of people who understand the world of the web (which is driving the shift to Cloud) and who get the complexity of the Enterprise. You need both, both in your organisation and in your suppliers. Invest and look for not only the technical experience, but the behavioural shift as well

3. Where is my data?

With a range of Cloud based services consumed by the business, you will have information across geographies, across different regulatory and even legal systems. It is not a blocker – but emphasises the need to know your supply chain where you need to know it, but be clear about the segregation of your data and services such that you can invest time in the right places. Get it wrong, and you leave yourself open to a continuity threat to your business

4. Is the price the price today, tomorrow and the future?

Some services will be traded as a commodity. Remember my earlier point about how often you can change your supplier for any particular service. How do you know about the options to change? How do you maintain visibility of the rapid dynamic in the market? Who do you trust to provide you with your direction? How do you create an ecosystem of partners that work with you in the way you want them to work – to potentially break the link between service continuity and supplier continuity?

5. And finally, who can you trust?

Who indeed, when so many people are in the loop. Your own people? Your existing suppliers? Your new suppliers? New partners providing aggregation or brokering or service wrapper services? How will you decide who is acting in your interests, or at worst in your shared interests, rather than in the interests of maintaining the status quo?

 

Continuity is built into most individual cloud service offerings. That isn’t the issue. The issue is clarity around Business Continuity across a portfolio of cloud services. The hybrid cloud, the cloud of clouds, the metacloud, the virtual private cloud operator will all exist. It will be the new norm.

The only question you face is not one of whether to play, but one of who you trust to provide the commodity service decisions that form the business services around which you need to guarantee continuity of service to your business consumers.

Who have you got to do the translation?

Little Red Riding Hood

Comments Off

Once upon a time, there was a little girl who lived in a village near the forest.  Whenever she went out, the little girl wore a red riding cloak, so everyone in the village called her Little Red Riding Hood. read more

“Let’s get one of those social network jobbies”

5 Comments »

I’ve heard it a few times recently. One large corporate organisation recently told me that they were looking to implement a corporate social network across their internal network. The supplier was all lined up and then the supplier was asked, “What do you use”.  They didn’t. Buying social media is not like buying SAP.

On the back of the Facebook effect, organisations have been talking about harnessing the social interactive power of their employees for around three to four years. Many organisations have spent much money implementing solutions. Just search Google. There are plenty of opinions.

• “Corporate Social Networks are a waste of money, study finds” http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/corporate_social_networks_are.php

• “Starting a corporate social network, don’t” http://www.businessweek.com/managing/content/may2009/ca2009058_371160.htm

read more

Onwards, Outwards, and Upwards

No Comments »

1 in 5 schoolchildren think Buzz Lightyear was the first man on the moon.  Buzz Aldrin was the second. Who was that Armstrong bloke anyway?

When man reached the South Pole, we all only remember Captain Scott of the Antarctic, who of course came second.

When Britain tuned in to Britain’s Got Talent, the rest of the world cannot get enough of Susan Boyle, who finished second.

Those most British of Sporting Heroes, Tim Henman and Frank Bruno were renowned for, largely, coming second (at best, though achieving glorious failure).

In all of that company, how could we be anything other than delighted to have achieved Second Place in the Computer Weekly 2010 IT Blog of the Year awards in the CIO Category. In years to come, if the world remembers Atos’ CIO Blog in the same breath as Tim Henman, Frank Bruno, Buzz Aldrin and Scott of the Antarctic then we (who feed the blog) will die happy men and women.

In the meantime, I’d like to recommend some of the other blogs that were in our category last night, all of whom I would have been happy to have seen top the table, were it not to be us. Check out James Gardner’s Bankervision, always a good innovative read and Paul Coby’s active blog and tweeting.

As to the TWEETWAR that is now raging amongst #blogawards contenders, then we look forward to next year’s event when we can cement our new found role as famous 2nd places in history with a chart topping double act just as our arch blog rivals have continued to do so until now.

Onwards, Outwards, and Upwards.

The Three Little Pigs

8 Comments »

Once upon a time there were three little pigs and the time came for them to leave home and seek their fortunes.

Before they left, their mother told them “Whatever you do, do it the best that you can because that’s the way to get along in the world. And keep safe.”

The first little pig built his house out of straw because it was the easiest thing to do.

The second little pig considered the approach of the first pig carefully. He correctly identified concerns around the flammable qualities of straw, realised that a well equipped wolf may be able to cut through the straw, or tunnel under the house and most of all recognised that the sound insulating properties of straw were insufficient to protect secret piggy meetings that may take place within.

One night the big bad wolf, who dearly loved to eat fat little piggies, came along and saw the first little pig in his house of straw. He said “Let me in, Let me in little pig or I’ll huff and I’ll puff and I’ll blow your house in!”

“Not by the hair of my chinny chin chin”, said the little pig.

Wanting to surprise the first pig, the wolf declined the huffing option, but planned a tactical assault, snooping on the pig with listening devices planted in the straw, and determining the most suitable point of entry by a targeted incendiary device causing minimal damage to the pig and the contents of the house, especially concerned about protecting the integrity of any particularly interesting IP or intelligence that he could subsequently exploit after eating the first pig.

read more

Onwards, Outwards, and Upwards

Comments Off

1 in 5 schoolchildren think Buzz Lightyear was the first man on the moon. Buzz Aldrin was the second. Who was that Armstrong bloke anyway?

When man reached the South Pole, we all only remember Captain Scott of the Antarctic, who of course came second.

When Britain tuned in to Britain’s Got Talent, the rest of the world cannot get enough of Susan Boyle, who finished second.

Those most British of Sporting Heroes, Tim Henman and Frank Bruno were renowned for, largely, coming second (at best, though achieving glorious failure).

In all of that company, how could we be anything other than delighted to have achieved Second Place in the Computer Weekly 2010 IT Blog of the Year awards in the CIO Category. In years to come, if the world remembers Atos’ CIO Blog in the same breath as Tim Henman, Frank Bruno, Buzz Aldrin and Scott of the Antarctic then we (who feed the blog) will die happy men and women.

In the meantime, I’d like to recommend some of the other blogs that were in our category last night, all of whom I would have been happy to have seen top the table, were it not to be us. Check out James Gardner’s Bankervision, always a good innovative read and Paul Coby’s active blog and tweeting.

As to the TWEETWAR that is now raging amongst #blogawards contenders, then we look forward to next year’s event when we can cement our new found role as famous 2nd places in history with a chart topping double act just as our arch blog rivals have continued to do so until now.

Onwards, Outwards, and Upwards.

The story of goldilocks and the three executives

1 Comment »

Once upon a time, there was a little girl named Goldilocks.  She  went for a walk in the City.  Pretty soon, she came upon a large office of a global corporate.  She knocked and, when no one answered, she walked right in and found herself in the Executive area.

At the table in the kitchen area, there were three breakfasts. Goldilocks was hungry.  She went to the first, a bowl which contained thick gloopy porridge from Starbucks. She tasted it.

“This porridge is too rich and creamy!” she exclaimed.

So, she moved on, and tasted the packet of crisps (Prawn Cocktail flavour) and jaffa cake laid out for the second breakfast.

“This breakfast is way too unhealthy,” she said

So, she went to the last bowl, but it was empty. Obviously its owner didn’t believe in the unnecessary expense of breakfast.

After she’d eaten the three Executives’ breakfasts she decided she was feeling a little tired.  So, she walked into the offices area where she saw three chairs.  Goldilocks sat in the first chair, a maroon coloured, leather studded armchair, to rest her feet.

“This chair is too cold and uncomfortable!” she exclaimed, although she was briefly interested in the IPad she noticed on the arm of the chair seemingly showing dashboard information of the current state of IT service provision to the business.

read more

Cloudsourcing: The hazy, lazy days of Summer

No Comments »

Remember as children, those hazy, lazy days in Summer, we used to lie on the grass gazing at the shapes that clouds made as they crossed that clear blue sky above?

“That one looks like a map of England”, or “that one is like a giraffe”, or “that one looks like you”. We were cloud watching. And now today, as Spring arrives and blue skies emerge from the dullness of Winter, it is ironic that we should now be doing the same thing. Cloud watching, yet not in the sky.

The adoption of Cloud services to date has been driven by dipping a toe in the water, sometimes a big toe, but a toe nonetheless. As I wrote in my previous article, many of these early Cloud adopting businesses have started with core generic processes such as HR, Finance or CRM. Some have looked at the commodity hosting benefits of scalable public cloud infrastructures and platforms such as Amazon or Force. Some have adopted, or are in the process of adopting, e-mail and office apps from providers such as Microsoft and Google. All have found that it is not a painless process to adopt and utilise these services, but that in the majority of cases they do drive benefits in the form of increased agility and/or decreased cost of service provisioning.

It feels as though we are about to move down a tangential evolutionary path. IT services have developed over the past twenty years through driving efficiency by scale. Outsourcers consolidate infrastructure provision across an IT function, or they group applications together in an Apps Management construct. These are connected through variant implementations of service desks, network provisioning, on-site support and more. If you want to outsource, there is an established path to follow, clear in terms of the procurement, the transition and the operation of such services. We know how they work, we know what to do. IT has evolved.

read more

Beyond the philosophy of the cloud

4 Comments »

A “week is a long time in politics” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_Wilson) and, normally seen in the destructive sense, we’d have to agree. Fundamental political shifts take longer and in my lifetime, seem to span large multi-term governments. Not so in our world of technology.

Only a year ago, the technology world was getting carried away with the “Cloud”. In my experience, few people really understood what it meant. Fast flying, nimble organisations had adopted Cloud philosophy at their core, salesforce.com being perhaps the most high profile. The technology giants such as Google and Amazon were promoting their Cloud offerings, massive low cost infrastructure centric capability and/or software tools accessible from them.

And then mid last year, it was decreed (informally I hasten to add) that the Cloud was overblown hype. We’d had utility computing, we’d had shared services, it was just the same thing with a different name. It started to cause confusion, to perhaps underplay the potential impact, perfectly illustrated by last Augusts comment from http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/44555 , Seemingly every IT vendor, even ones that have nothing to do with the cloud, is using the satisfyingly vague word to describe every product they have ever released.” This made the challenge of planning an approach to Cloud adoption confusing and emphasised the need for a guide.

Of course, the blip was brief and now in February 2010 it is becoming widely recognised that we are entering a new phase of this evolving world of business enabling IT services. This will be a bigger change, a more fundamental change than I think I’ve seen before in my 20-odd years of work. It will change the way IT service organisations operate. It will change the way corporate business consumes technology services, they way in which they are currently defined as needed. It will drive a shift more towards flexible, agile decisions supported by agile technology – requiring more effective alignment of new ways of working for the business. It will redraw the line between innovation and risk slightly further to the right.

One wonders whether this perfect storm is due to the economic downturn, or is it a co-incidence that this maturing of a new level of commoditisation of IT services should strike right here, right now? Co-incidence maybe, but surely the recession has been a catalyst to faster adoption, a reason to embrace the perceived benefits that can be accrued.  Many of these offers are yet to mature, yet to evolve into what they could ultimately become. But make no mistake, they will. This new world is here to stay – and the time is  certainly right to be brave, to adopt, adapt and reap. So what is beyond the philosophy of the cloud? What will we find?

We know that organisations such as Netsuite and Force have focused on core business processes such as financials and sales. We know that Infrastructure providers will provide low cost Public and Private Cloud solutions that will effectively (and securely, and with excellent availability – again beyond the hype) host more of the application portfolio. We know that e-mail, office and support apps will move to a Software as a Service offering. It is happening now. It will continue to happen.

What is beyond is where it gets really interesting. Where it changes the model of IT supplier and IT consumer, blurring the lines between software and bespoke business  processes. How do we effectively create new ways of working, supported by simplified shared transaction processes, vertical sub-market or niche business function. I’m fascinated by the opportunity (for corporate or 3rd parties) to create niche SaaS solutions replacing legacy applications,  that have the ability to operate over multiple organisations or multiple geographies. Solutions that historically may have been seen as too complex, too bespoke, will now be challenged in this quest for simplicity and cost effectiveness. Decisions like this will require business compromise, will require emotional separation, searching for ever smaller ways to differentiate the business effectiveness whilst deploying greater use of commodity service.

In this new world, corporates will consume business enabling services from a multiplicity of public and private clouds, through a range of software/platform/infrastructure/business process as a services. Interoperability and integration will be critical to effectively exploiting this model, and a new service management and business operational model will be needed to effectively provide visibility and management to this distributed service environment.  We will need a new Target Operating Model to be defined. IT professionals will need to evolve as IT provision becomes simpler for the business to access, but the business will still need the informed guide, advising them as to how best to make the strategic and tactical choices to navigate this fast changing environment.

Beyond the philiosophy of the Cloud is CHOICE. Enablement. Bringing you the power to implement decisions faster than you have done before. There is however a catch. To enter this new world, software, infrastructure, and platform providers will need to accept that desired freedom of choice – we will need to recognise that the world is different. To recognise that software licences are historical fact. That fixed term contracts are not as rigid as they once were. That there is a need to facilitate change through interoperability, not to suppress change.

This connected world in which we inhabit operates through personal desire and freedom. You cannot mandate. You cannot demand. You must each be the provider of choice. To constantly evolve to meet the continued need for improved service.

Beyond the philosophy of the Cloud is REALITY. It’s here. It will become pervasive.

It’s an exciting new world. For some, it’s quite scary too.