Understanding the Potential of Neuromarketing

Neuromarketing extends traditional marketing techniques through the application of neuroscience, leveraging advances in greater understanding of brain function and developments in brain scanning techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG). The ability to “measure the brain while it is operating” and interpret emotional response and “engagement” provides new opportunity in measuring the effectiveness of many aspects of product design and advertising.

Eye tracking, pupillometers, Galvanic skin response (as used in polygraph devices) and other peripheral nervous system measures have sought to provide insight into ‘deep brain’ activity and emotional response to stimuli (in advertising and other contexts) for some years. The ability to monitor (be that by fMRI or other means) deep brain function, comprehend (with “reasonable certainty”) the cause and effect of positive and negative emotional response would provide an unprecedented insight into the subconscious and provide a revolutionary path to product design and market testing.

Neuromarketing cannot however dismiss standardisation requirements, regulation and ethical application. It suffers from “over claiming”, has significant cost implications, scalability challenges and interpretation ‘difficulties’ based on gaps in our current understanding of neural function (in part I refer to the limbic system). Cost and scalability of using fMRI are clearly issues as it requires expensive and highly specialised equipment and facilitates analysis of one “subject” at a time. Conducting sample testing on significant volume of participants is therefore impractical. Some have suggested that this simply requires highly focused subject choice (such as key market influencers); although “plausible” this accepts a fundamental limitation and loses a great deal of “statistical potential”. EEG is significantly cheaper and portable and benefits from higher temporal resolution, but (with scalp EEG) brain structures such as the amygdala or hippocampus may not be clearly visible. Peripheral nervous system measurements have at times meandered into pseudo-science although there are some promising advances.

Neuromarketing has its detractors, fearing exploitation and even “idea implantation”, although I equate this with the hocus pocus of mind control and subliminal manipulation. Marketers also want something which is simple to understand “will this campaign work”, “is this a winning product” and elements of neuroscience research and marketing exuberance seem immiscible.

The key to unlocking neuromarketing’s potential is the development of our understanding of how the brain works. Our functional understanding continuously improves, but should be understood to be the ultimate limiting factor. The proprietary nature of initial developments may also stifle progress, and a healthy focus on existing techniques should be maintained (such as covert observation, psychophysiology etc.).

If neuroscience developments and neuromarketing really delivered, some of the potential benefits would include:

  • A radical new approach to focus groups and product testing. Insights into deep brain function with “no requirement for surveys” and their many associated pitfalls (translation, misinterpretation etc.). This also removes any ‘localisation’ or cultural aspects of traditional product testing
  • The ability to create “emotional heatmaps” – in other words not only see (through eye tracking) connections with visual content, but also understand emotional engagement with content. This would drive optimisation of media effectiveness
  • An exceptional opportunity to augment traditional sentiment analysis techniques
  • Improved product design and surety of that design through improved analytical technique, process optimisation, reduced cost and reduced risk
  • An opportunity to rethink and restructure web content and its presentation

Naturally (and I share the cynicism) altruistic or pro-social uses of neuromarketing may not top the agenda. There is however real potential in this regard, for example:

  • The potential to analyse compulsive disorders (such as the underlying behavioural patterns in compulsive and impulsive purchasing)
  • Designing safety advertising that conveys simple, engaging and memorable information
  • Designing health campaigns and public information campaigns that are again emotionally connecting and memorable

One of my “really out there” visions of the potential of neuromarketing is the creation (years hence) of “Adaptive HCI’s”. In other words an intelligent Human Computer Interface with the ability to personalise ‘user experience’ driven by ‘self-detected, subconscious emotional responses’.

Steve Nimmons

Steve is head of Enterprise Architecture Consulting in the UK, a member of the Atos Scientific Community and global track leader for Open Innovation. A Certified European Engineer, Chartered Engineer, Chartered Fellow of the British Computer Society, Fellow of the Royal Institution, Royal Society of Arts, Linnean Society, Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, Institute for the Management of Information Systems and Institution of Analysts and Programmers he is a Freeman of London, an Honorary Citizen of North Carolina and a Commissioned Kentucky Colonel. Steve describes himself as a “polymath, lapsang souchong ‘addict’ and a pattern seeker”

3 comments

  1. Mike Simpson says:

    The Real Time Club’s initiative seems fascinating. One of the truisms that i have noted since commencing and completing my medical degree a couple of decades ago was that as we increase our knowledge in any given area then we realise that the level of interaction increases as the scale decreases. I suspect that the changes that take place at a quantum level secondary to molecular conformational change mediated by ionic flow through the individual channels present in neuronal synapses will provide a clearer understanding of (at least) the power of the brain but yet may still leave us wondering about the dichotomy of mind vs blancmange!

    Can I also be so bold as to suggest that you also pick up a copy of Neal Stephenson’s “Anathem” as there are some wonderful conceptualisations of consciousness within its pages which you may enjoy. The parts detailing the idea that how do we know that reality actually exists when all the information that our brains have to hand is at a remove from what we actually experience in-as-much as there is no direct link from reality to conciousness that doesn’t come through and be processed by our senses are quite thought provoking and tie in with Prof Stein’s thoughts on future prediction and time sensitivity. I suspect that the author has been examining the same issues that are to be raised by the Real Time Club’s initiative.

    Mike

  2. Thanks Mike, not read the novel but it sounds like something I should add to the ‘commute schedule’. Part of my thinking in this subject stemmed from the launch of The Real Time Club’s
    Brain Mind Forum.

    Inspired by Hilbert’s “Questions for Mathematicians”, the aim is to compile “21 key questions cognitive neuroscience needs to address in the 21st Century”. We had a very interesting address from John Stein, Professor of Physiology at Oxford University, on neurophysiology and cognition at the opening meeting.

    I’m immensely tempted to suggest SQUID-MRI to Bruce Schneier for his Friday Squid Blogging. He may however conclude I’d had too many radionuclides :-)

    Check out the Real Time Club’s initiative. Stein’s opener “Thinking about Thinking” was fascinating…

  3. Mike Simpson says:

    Sounds partly like Neal Stephenson’s novel “Interface” :)
    fMRI is still unfortunately a very rough tool in asmuch as it will show activation of broad areas of the brain’s underlying structure and the technical problems of generating a 3 tesla field are fairly significant. Some of the recent work using SQUID-MRI may prove to be of use but we may have to wait until SPECT scanners become 1) more common place and 2) much smaller before we get to the degree of resolution necessary for true “neuromarketing” to be useful (though test subjects may baulk at having to ingest a radionuclide)

    Mike

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>